This blog intends to educate the global audience about our country. We would like to debunk the stereotypes perpetuated against Pakistan. We extend a hand of friendship and understanding to all people who have been given a negative perception due to the actions of a few in Pakistan. This is the Pakistani perspective. If you are a visitor from another country. Please drop us a line/comment/suggestion and your country of origin. Thanks!

٩/٢١/١٤٢٧

Myth: Pakistan's so called democracies were better than the current regime



Excerpt from Copyrighted Material. Permission Granted by holder of copyrights.
Internationaly Copyrights apply.
© 2006 M. Usman

The Decade of Darkness: Shamocracies in Pakistan

Pakistan’s decade of democracy can be more aptly described as a decade of darkness. The era of democracy witnessed two democratically elected governments destroy the very fledgling democracy that brought them to power. The Sharif and Bhutto regimes were marred in corruption, economic stagnation, civil disorder and a culture of nepotism. Pakistan was on the verge of bankruptcy barely able to pay interest on 38 billion dollars of back-breaking debt. Critical government positions became a revolving door for unqualified party lackeys. The economy was in shambles, the youth disaffected and a middle class stretched to its limits. Karachi was paralyzed with fear, strikes, curfews, ethnic and sectarian violence. Economic indicators were placing Pakistan just above the ranks of Rwanda, Somalia and Haiti. This was the state of the 'union’ when general Musharraf took over the country. The ensuing seven years have shown Pakistan is better off with a goal-driven, result-oriented military leadership than a corrupt, self-serving, ethno-centric democracy.

Harvard alumnus, Ms. Bhutto, gave the people great hope after the incompetent dictatorship of general Zia-ul-Haq but her government was embroiled in corruption and civil disorder. So blatant was the level of nepotism that Ms. Bhutto’s husband, Asif Zardari, was appointed federal minister of investments. Mr. Zardari’s kickback schemes were documented in detail by various BBC specials. The urban centers of Sind were on the verge of a full-blown war between various ethnic factions. Journalists from Jang were beaten for unfavorable editorials in this sham democracy. Karachi’s law and order situation had deteriorated into a national nightmare. Pakistan’s fickle public was openly demanding for a military takeover.

The Sharif regime certainly did not fare any better. An increasingly authoritarian Mr. Sharif rewrote the constitution, demoted the president to a ceremonial figurehead, dismissed the chief justice due to corruption charges, coached general karamat into retirement and promoted some amiable fellow named Pervaiz. In short order, the democratically elected industrialist had effectively become king of Pakistan. His policies and expensive projects bankrupted the Pakistani treasury. Indian editorials gleefully pointed out the fact Pakistan’s per capita income had dipped to the level of sub-Saharan countries. An increasingly empowered India was prematurely celebrating the final death blow to the two nation theory. By the end of the 90’s, Mr. Sharif and Ms. Bhutto had ravaged the nation under the façade of democracy.

It is inconvenient to recall these dire circumstances inherited by General Musharraf after his atypical coup d’etat of October 1999. This selective amnesia may be the result of 7 years of relative prosperity. Pakistan’s economy has experienced unprecedented growth of 6% to 8% for the last 6 years. The economy is experiencing the second fastest growth in Asia. If such robust growth can be sustained for another 7 years, Pakistan could be a transformed into a middle income nation. Per capita income has increased to 815$ which is the highest in the region. 10 million people have been rescued from poverty. Exports have increased by 22 per cent. For the first time in history, foreign exchange reserves have crossed the 13 billion dollar mark. In 1999, India’s foreign exchange reserves were 40 times higher than Pakistan. By 2002, this disparity declined to a more proportionate 8 times the reserves of Pakistan. External debt has been rescheduled and restructured. The tax code was simplified and a record amount was collected from loan defaulters and tax evaders. Revenue collection has increased by 22%. International attitudes about Pakistan have shifted dramatically attracting 2 billion dollars annually in foreign direct investment. FDI has increased by a whopping 120% versus the decade of democracy. Even the staunchest critics of Pakistan’s economic policies such as IMF and World Bank now praise President Musharraf’s economic initiatives. The man appointed by President Musharraf and credited with much of the accelerated economic growth is Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz. Not since Berkeley graduate Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto has Pakistan been lead by such an astute and qualified individual. Mr. Aziz was declared Finance Minister of the year by EuroMoney and Banker’s Magazine in 2001. Mr. Aziz’s repertoire includes leading the global finance division of one of the world’s biggest and most profitable companies. The Armani suited Shaukat could be living a life of luxury on some island resort after his illustrious career in banking. Inexplicably, he has chosen a life of repeated assassinations, suicide bombs and political mudslinging to become the principal architect of Pakistan’s economic turnaround. The pair has managed to do the seemingly impossible by attracting foreign capital to a country advertised as the epicenter of terrorism by foreign media. Development can be seen all over the country. A seven-star 250 million dollar hotel is being built in Islamabad by investors of Dubai’s Burj-al-Arab fame. IT and BPO exports, while small, are increasing yearly. Gulf Countries are investing heavily in President Musharraf’s vision for gwadar. The economy even absorbed a devastating earthquake, political tremors, regional wars, drought and floods. The Musharraf–Aziz tandem is a far cry from the days when Mr. Zardari was the caretaker of the country’s financial “interests”. Even the harshest critics of the military have reluctantly conceded that President Musharraf’s tenure has been the best Pakistani administration for decades. Perhaps the greatest accomplishment is the restoration of hope and pride in a cynic Diaspora. Droves of Pakistanis have returned to their homeland with dollars, pounds and riyals in hand, further supplementing a growing economy. In a recent interview, an Analyst from the widely respected Economist magazine stated “he (President Musharraf) has made some sensible moves such as privatizing 5 billion dollars worth of state assets to bidders. Needless red tape has been removed, tax regulations and tax collection has been improved. If he is able to complete his objectives, history will smile upon him”.

Politically, President Musharraf has taken some courageous actions. Who can argue with his u-turn against misguided extremists in the post 9/11 world? The Talibanization of Pakistan has been reversed. Feudal lords, the scourge of Pakistan, are feeling the wrath of the military. Ethnic and sectarian violence is relatively subdued despite the best efforts of covert foreign intervention. Semi-literate mullahs that misinterpret Islam by preaching hatred have been arrested. An open exchange of ideas is taking place in a vibrant media that enjoys unprecedented freedom. He has walked a tightrope and chosen a path of sanity by joining the world against extremists evicted from the Sudan and Afghanistan. No international forum is spared without a mention of Kashmiri and Palestinian struggle.

The Musharraf administration has reformed many public services and upgrades to the social sector. Roads and infrastructure are being upgraded and local governance has improved. 400 million dollars is being spent on renewable energy. Karachi is visibly cleaner due to energetic and youthful local governance. 100 million dollars is being spent on the Karachi mega-city project. While previous administrations have paid lip service to development of the smaller provinces, President Musharraf has converted words into action. A record amount of the national budget has been allocated for the smaller provinces. An intelligent and coherent strategy has been put forward for the development of an energy, transportation and trade corridor from Gwadar to Central Asia. 3 major pipelines (TAPI, IPI, QP) are being pursued to transfer energy to thirsty neighboring giants India and Pakistan. Makhran highway among other infrastructure projects has been seen through completion. Money has been poured into education although much of the funds are stolen by a corrupt lower-level bureaucracy. Educational reforms introduced by Chaudary Pervez Elahi in Punjab are being adopted nationally to check corruption. While previous administrations have bickered endlessly over water and energy y shortages, President Musharraf has undertaken the initiative of building dams and reactors that will cushion the nation from energy outages, droughts and floods.

This is not to say Mr. Musharraf’s resume is free of blemishes. Undoubtedly, President Musharraf has made several mistakes and these errors in judgment are dissected regularly in countless editorials. A hastily organized referendum was certainly a major mistake. Propping up a theocratic MMA was another. The kargil fiasco is widely attributed to then General Musharraf. Incursions into Wana have done nothing but expose the federation’s weakness. Unnecessarily blunt and insensitve comments about Mukhtar Mai is yet another blow to our already battered public image. Purchases of expensive, high-maintenance F16s from a notoriously unreliable supplier is yet another mistake. Pakistan’s economic losses due to the American invasion of Afghanistan were underestimated thus undercutting foreign aid. However, Mr. Musharraf’s vision, reforms and track record far exceeds that of his so-called democratic predecessors. While previous military and democratic leaders have been self-serving failures, President Musharraf has actually strengthened many of the institutions required for a proper democracy. By all accounts, Pakistan was headed on a nose-diving trajectory. It was resurrected from the depths of failure by the astute leadership of the current military regime. From restoring civil liberties, empowering women and minorities, promoting education, upgrading infrastructure to reviving the economy, the statistics are indisputable. The general has been good for the country. Some day, we will have a true democracy. Until that day, we will choose an honest military man over ineffective, authoritarian 'democracies'.

10 Comments:

Blogger Mayank Austen Soofi said...

My point is that Mr. Musharraf may be a angel in disguise but he can never be the answer to Pakistan's problems. There is no better alternative to democracy. And I do not agree that Pakistan need time for its democracy to get mature. A democracy do not mature by voting in governments but voting out governments - a right which Pakistani people has never been allowed to exercise. Courtsey its army. If Ms Buhtto or Mr. Sharief were incompenent and corrupt, let the people kick them out of power. Why call in army generals?

٢:٣٦ ص

 
Blogger Usman said...

Good questions.

The people did kick out Benazir from office via elections and voting.

Nawaz could not be kicked out because he had made himself emperor.

He held so much power that even our military dictators would envy him.

٧:١١ م

 
Blogger Usman said...

ya... she lost to nawaz i think. now i am not sure.

٤:٠٧ م

 
Blogger Mayank Austen Soofi said...

she indeed lost to Mr. Sharief. but when she lost the elections, she was no longer in power. Mr. Ghulam ishaq Khan was the president who had dismissed her government.....Mr. Aslam beg was teh army chief.....or it was Mr. Leghari who was the presidnet....if im not wrong, pakistan never has voted out a sitting prime minister.

ps: and i ahvent got any pics. my e-mail is mayankaz@yahoo.com

١٢:٢٢ ص

 
Blogger Usman said...

Oh I see. She was doing a very poor job, people were demanding her ouster. Pakistan was in very bad shape. The president is within his constitutional rights to dismiss the prime minister and call for new elections.

Her husband was sucking the treasury dry.

٤:٤٧ م

 
Blogger Mayank Austen Soofi said...

Buddy, if her husband (mr ten percent) was sucking the treasury dry, it was the priviledge of Pakistan's awaaam to chuck her out. A president in a parliamentary form of government is supposed to be like Queen Elizabeth II - sitting pretty and riding on horse-backs. And not dismissing governments even if its corrupt. Thats for Pakistan people and judiciary to work on. I want pakistanis to ahve that power to chuck out their governments. Not their unelected presidents and army generals. Only than Pakistan can become really powerful and really idnependent.

١١:٣٣ م

 
Blogger Usman said...

Mayank, my brain tell me that she should not have been removed, my heart tells me that benazir and nawaz needed to be replaced by a lesser evil by any means necessary

In this titanic inner struggle, which side won?

I am Pakistani yaar, of course the emotions won!

٧:٣٦ م

 
Blogger Mayank Austen Soofi said...

Thats the problem with both Pakistanis and Indians - They are too emotional! Smile....

٢:٣٧ ص

 
Anonymous غير معرف said...

Great information Usman. Even and balanced criticism of all the politicians. Mayank how the hell are the people supposed to over throw a government that supresses them in every shape and form? The army is the last resort and the only instituion the people trust enought to over throw corrupt leaders. The people need to be empowered and have faith that they are infact chossing the destiny of the country through electing leaders who will answer to their needs and demands. When paranoid leaders like Nawaz start redrafting the consistiion to build power the people are the first to be toppled.

٣:٤٠ م

 
Anonymous غير معرف said...

great article usman~!

mayank: democracy is the answer to a lot of questions, but my view is.. isn't what we've got now democracy?

you say 'people should've chucked them out' when talking about PM's and such, the people couldn't even choose who their own mayors were to be, much less the PM!

right now, i see a lot more happening because of the 'devolution to the grassroots' scheme by the president. Now, we finally have a say in what goes on in our local communities, which was never the case b4...

١٠:٥٦ م

 

إرسال تعليق

<< Home